Canon 5DMKIII Naudicam housing

Post and discuss beautiful underwater photos and video brought back from the depths of the sea.
Post Reply
tahoe1840
Hi, I'm New To NWDC!
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 5:22 pm

Canon 5DMKIII Naudicam housing

Post by tahoe1840 »

I'm looking for some thoughts on a new rig I'm building. The housing is a Nauticam NA-5DMKIII housing a Canon 5DMKIII full frame camera. I'd like to couple the housing with a good lens that has versatility. I'm considering a Canon EF 16-35 USM II 2.8 or a Canon EF 24-70 USM. Or if anyone has a little more experience then I, I am open for suggestions. Ports, extension ring, and zoom/focus gears are readily available for both of these lens and the housing.
Thanks for the help
User avatar
YellowEye
I've Got Gills
Posts: 3240
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:08 am

Re: Canon 5DMKIII Naudicam housing

Post by YellowEye »

Hi! I'm not too familiar with that camera or those lenses however they sound like they're mid-range lenses. Most photographers go quite a bit wider or more toward macro. If you're looking for specific advice on cameras and lenses see if you can get a hold of nirupam, he reviews and test a lot of cameras. njnigam on this board.

Hope you enjoy your new setup!
Visit pnwdiving.com for viz reports, slack planning, galleries and more!
tahoe1840
Hi, I'm New To NWDC!
Posts: 2
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2023 5:22 pm

Re: Canon 5DMKIII Naudicam housing

Post by tahoe1840 »

Thx YellowEye, I'll look for him/her. Maybe a beter question would be, "What's a good versatile lens for a full frame camera?"
User avatar
YellowEye
I've Got Gills
Posts: 3240
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:08 am

Re: Canon 5DMKIII Naudicam housing

Post by YellowEye »

I think a prime (non zoom) macro lens would probably be your best bet. It would allow you to shoot in more conditions with great quality, easier learning curve at a reasonable price. Macro definitely allows you to get a lot more "ooh wow" shots than a mid-range. The next step after macro would be a flip diopter, then wide angle. I haven't seen much use for a mid-range other than if you want to get a lot of rockfish shots
Visit pnwdiving.com for viz reports, slack planning, galleries and more!
User avatar
ljjames
I've Got Gills
Posts: 2725
Joined: Mon Jan 22, 2007 9:46 pm

Re: Canon 5DMKIII Naudicam housing

Post by ljjames »

I love love love my 16-35 on full frame and have used it extensively to shoot documentary footage for pbs, nat geo etc... the 24-70 is more of a portrait lens underwater, even with the full frame. its just never -quite- wide enough for me and I have to get further away which is not ideal. The beauty of the 16-35 is you can get really close and reduce the amount of water between your lens and subject so better clarity, color and less diffusion from water. yes it gets a bit fishy on the 16mm end of things but its really my go to lens for underwater on a full frame sensor. No matter what you get, really make sure to follow the recommendations for the extenders to get the focus distance correct for your dome + lens combo. Few things are worse than having a beautiful glass dome, L series glass and soft footage cause you didn't take into account that with the dome port, its focusing on the virtual image, NOT shooting through the lens :)

So.. in summary, 16-35 on full frame if you like shooting close focus wide angle or your dive buddies, and match your lens/dome port combo.
----
"I survived the Brittandrea Dorikulla, where's my T-shirt!"
Post Reply