Non current sites...

General banter about diving and why we love it.
User avatar
Jaksonbrown
Amphibian
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:58 pm

Non current sites...

Post by Jaksonbrown »

Whats the best boat dive site around Whidbey island that would not be current sensitive? Any suggestions...?
It looks like this weekend is gonna be pretty much a big current weekend all day long....

Cory-
User avatar
Norris
NWDC Moderator
NWDC Moderator
Posts: 4710
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:31 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Norris »

Any help would be appreciated, Ive been scouring the world wide innertube, but info is minimal.
**Pinch it, don't stick your finger through. You're just pinching a bigger hole.
CAPTNJACK - 2012**
dsteding
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:50 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by dsteding »

Others will chime in that know Whidbey well, but my first reaction (given the topography of the area) is that one doesn't really exist.

Langley maybe?
Fishstiq wrote:
To clarify.........

I cannot stress enough that this is MY PROBLEM.
User avatar
Jaksonbrown
Amphibian
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:58 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Jaksonbrown »

What about up in Port Susan? Anybody know of anywhere up there??
User avatar
CaptnJack
I've Got Gills
Posts: 7776
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:29 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by CaptnJack »

Jaksonbrown wrote:What about up in Port Susan? Anybody know of anywhere up there??
Mud!

Langley has the most stuff to see. You could try up on Fidalgo. Bowman Bay area is doable at slack.
Sounder wrote:Under normal circumstances, I would never tell another man how to shave his balls... but this device should not be kept secret.
User avatar
Jaksonbrown
Amphibian
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:58 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Jaksonbrown »

Unfortunatly, Slack this weekend is at 7:30am and 3:30 pm....
Hence the need of a non current site as we will be diving mid day...
User avatar
LCF
I've Got Gills
Posts: 5697
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 5:05 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by LCF »

The biggest problem is that a lot of the possible dive sites off Whidbey Island are just slopes of silt with sea pens. You might PM Jan K, as I think he has the most experience on and off Whidbey, but this is the challenge of Puget Sound diving. There are simply some weekends where the best places to dive are not very interesting, unless you are a critter person who is willing to look for the little stuff, or the things you don't see unless you dive over the muck. Sometimes it's fun to go investigate a site where nobody habitually dives, but I think you guys are low on experience to do that. Talk to Jan -- maybe he'll have some info for you.
"Sometimes, when your world is going sideways, the second best thing to everything working out right, is knowing you are loved..." ljjames
User avatar
divemaster08
Avid Diver
Posts: 65
Joined: Mon Jan 05, 2009 8:32 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by divemaster08 »

try asking lonewolf. i heard he knows of a few places to get in the water.
User avatar
mattwave
Amphibian
Posts: 850
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 8:46 am

Re: Non current sites...

Post by mattwave »

Gedney Island barges I have been told can be protected on an ebb, but I have heard of current stories there so I dive it on slack tide. Langlely is ok, fidalgo I hear has terrible vis right now. Looking at the exchange it's hard to say there will be slack anywhere.
"Scuba Like You Love It!"
Let's go diving
User avatar
Jaksonbrown
Amphibian
Posts: 849
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 12:58 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Jaksonbrown »

And the forcast continues to get better.... Now calling for rain and 18-25kt winds. This is forcasted to produce 3-5 foot wind waves....Makes for rough boat diving....
User avatar
Dusty2
I've Got Gills
Posts: 6388
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 9:04 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Dusty2 »

Makes for unsafe Boat diving! I would say Pass on the boat dive Idea. It's not going to be a fun day no matter where you go.
User avatar
Nwbrewer
I've Got Gills
Posts: 4624
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:59 am

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Nwbrewer »

Shouldn't be much current in the lake.... :salute:
dsteding
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:50 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by dsteding »

Nwbrewer wrote:Shouldn't be much current in the lake.... :salute:
That's where were headed, the Dawn/Hauler on Saturday. Figured with the crappy tides it was a good day to lounge in the Lake.
Fishstiq wrote:
To clarify.........

I cannot stress enough that this is MY PROBLEM.
User avatar
Nwbrewer
I've Got Gills
Posts: 4624
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:59 am

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Nwbrewer »

Nice. Probably a little out of the OP's depth range though. There's always the sunken forest.
User avatar
Norris
NWDC Moderator
NWDC Moderator
Posts: 4710
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 2:31 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Norris »

Whats the depth?
**Pinch it, don't stick your finger through. You're just pinching a bigger hole.
CAPTNJACK - 2012**
User avatar
Nwbrewer
I've Got Gills
Posts: 4624
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:59 am

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Nwbrewer »

Of the Dawn/Hauler, or the forest?
dsteding
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:50 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by dsteding »

Nwbrewer wrote:Nice. Probably a little out of the OP's depth range though. There's always the sunken forest.
Yeah, was just making an off-handed comment, not a destination suggestion for the OP.

Dawn is ~110 ffw to the mud, Hauler is ~120 ffw to the mud.
Fishstiq wrote:
To clarify.........

I cannot stress enough that this is MY PROBLEM.
User avatar
BDub
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1327
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:39 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by BDub »

dsteding wrote:Dawn is ~110 ffw to the mud, Hauler is ~120 ffw to the mud.
Definitely 18/45, or even 15/55! :smt119
Last edited by BDub on Wed Jan 28, 2009 2:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
http://www.frogkickdiving.com/

"It's a lot easier when you're not doing it" - CaseyB449

"There needs to be more strawberry condoms. Just not on my regulator" - DSteding
dsteding
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:50 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by dsteding »

BDub wrote:
dsteding wrote:Dawn is ~110 ffw to the mud, Hauler is ~120 ffw to the mud.
Definitely 18/54, or even 15/55! :smt119
10/70, don't breathe until 15 feet. Duh.
Fishstiq wrote:
To clarify.........

I cannot stress enough that this is MY PROBLEM.
User avatar
camerone
Submariner
Posts: 517
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2008 7:58 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by camerone »

dsteding wrote: Yeah, was just making an off-handed comment, not a destination suggestion for the OP.

Dawn is ~110 ffw to the mud, Hauler is ~120 ffw to the mud.
The problem with those isn't the depth...it's the fact that the viz usually sucks, and there's lots to get tangled up on with 'em. You can be inside the Dawn without even knowing you've penetrated it.

-C
There are no stupid questions, but there sure are a lot of inquisitive idiots...
dsteding
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:50 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by dsteding »

No kidding-it is dark, dark, dark down there.
camerone wrote: The problem with those isn't the depth...it's the fact that the viz usually sucks, and there's lots to get tangled up on with 'em. You can be inside the Dawn without even knowing you've penetrated it.

-C
Fishstiq wrote:
To clarify.........

I cannot stress enough that this is MY PROBLEM.
User avatar
Nwbrewer
I've Got Gills
Posts: 4624
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:59 am

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Nwbrewer »

dsteding wrote:No kidding-it is dark, dark, dark down there.
camerone wrote: The problem with those isn't the depth...it's the fact that the viz usually sucks, and there's lots to get tangled up on with 'em. You can be inside the Dawn without even knowing you've penetrated it.

-C
I treat dives in the lake with about a +30' factor. A 70' dive in the lake feels like a 100' dive in the Sound. YMMV.
dsteding
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:50 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by dsteding »

Nwbrewer wrote: I treat dives in the lake with about a +30' factor. A 70' dive in the lake feels like a 100' dive in the Sound. YMMV.
Yes, 150 feet in the lake is uber dark-the Bomber is still a great dive, however.

The joy of helium, I don't think I'd want to be below about 80 feet in the lake without it.
Fishstiq wrote:
To clarify.........

I cannot stress enough that this is MY PROBLEM.
User avatar
Burntchef
I've Got Gills
Posts: 3175
Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 8:29 pm

Re: Non current sites...

Post by Burntchef »

i love lake

i love lamp
Chin high, puffed chest, we step right to it
The choice is there ain't no choice but to pursue it


"Diving the gas is the easy part, not much to it, plenty of retards are using it safely. " jamieZ
User avatar
BigFameOne
Compulsive Diver
Posts: 340
Joined: Wed Sep 17, 2008 9:10 am

Re: Non current sites...

Post by BigFameOne »

So I can literally hit a golf ball into the lake from my home (and I can't hit a golf ball for anything) so of course the Lake is an appealing dive destination for me, BUT I am only OW certified. Anything there I can do?
"Cave is cave. Tech is when you can't get out when you want to."-LCF
Post Reply