MT No. 6

Tell us your tale of coming nose-to-nose with a 6 gill [--this big--], or about your vacation to turquoise warm waters. Share your adventures here!
User avatar
Romer Treece
Pelagic
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 pm

MT No. 6

Post by Romer Treece »

A few of us went out to dive the MT 6 out in Elliot Bay (approx. 1600 feet from cove 1 if I remember correctly) on the Aluminator. On board was: Ron Akeson, Rob Wilson (rjw), Paul Hangartner (Bigsky), Josh Smith (aka Nailer/JoshuaSmith), BJ Nussbaum (Maverick), and myself Dan Warter.

We basically dropped the hook right by it, and prepared for two teams of 3. Myself, Josh, and Rob were team 1, with BJ, Paul, and Ron bringing up the rear. :bootyshake: Our plan was for a 20-25 minute bottom time with Josh tying in the strobe, Rob on the reel, and me filming.

We dropped down, and visibility reminded me of the lake on a good vis day-a dirty 6-8 feet. We tied in the reel and proceeded to swim around the side of the wreck. Not only did the visibility remind me of the lake but so did the wreck. A lot of wood structure, BUT a fair amount of Metridium to remind you that it's the sound. We saw some Rockfish, some nudi's and A LOT of old cave line-annoying animal!! We poked around inside (if you want to call it inside) a bit, and continued to trace our way around the heap. This wreck is pretty trashed on, and it is hard to make ANYTHING out, let alone visualize the boat it was.

It is reported that some of the train boxs went down with the ship, if so there are no signs of them, or I couldn't make them out.

We headed back up at 25 minutes, while watching the other team just starting their dive.

Interesting wreck; it will make for a good scooter ride someday.

History here: http://dcsfilms.com/Site_4/DCS_Website_68.html

Video here: http://dcsfilms.com/Site_4/DCS_Website_70.html
dsteding
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1857
Joined: Mon Jun 12, 2006 7:50 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by dsteding »

Who is putting cave line on these things? Richard, was there line on it when you and Nick videoed it a while back?
Fishstiq wrote:
To clarify.........

I cannot stress enough that this is MY PROBLEM.
User avatar
Joshua Smith
I've Got Gills
Posts: 10250
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:32 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Joshua Smith »

VERY cool, Dan! I really liked the job you did on the history, there. Too bad those guys you dive with are such clowns, or else you'd be able to get some decent video.... :supz:
Maritime Documentation Society

"To venture into the terrible loneliness, one must have something greater than greed. Love. One needs love for life, for intrigue, for mystery."
User avatar
rjw
Aquanaut
Posts: 632
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 9:55 am

Re: MT No. 6

Post by rjw »

I have to agree with Josh. Nice write up on the history.
Now if you could just find some decent guys to do these dives with you...............................
No amount of Helium can make a dumbass smart. - Chatterton
FOTTF
Life's been good to me so far
User avatar
Maverick
I've Got Gills
Posts: 2517
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:57 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Maverick »

I wish i would have seen the pictures before the dive, i might have been able to tell where the hell we were on the wreck. It was a really fun day.
Maverick

Diving. . . is an active physical form of meditation. It is so silent- You're like a thought.

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR
ANYTHING, BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE
STAIRS.
User avatar
Romer Treece
Pelagic
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Romer Treece »

Maverick wrote:I wish i would have seen the pictures before the dive, i might have been able to tell where the hell we were on the wreck. It was a really fun day.

I saw it and I had no fricken clue!
It was stripped down so it will look a lot different.

I saw a pic of the MT No. 7 and it was a man made barge similar to the Foss 75. But this one was just stripped down to the decks with one pilot house.
Foss.jpg
User avatar
Grateful Diver
I've Got Gills
Posts: 5322
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:52 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Grateful Diver »

Nice video ... I'd like to dive it again sometime. When we did it last year we had pretty good vis on the barge ... and maybe 2-foot vis on our deco stops ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Threats and ultimatums are never the best answer. Public humiliation via Photoshop is always better - airsix

Come visit me at http://www.nwgratefuldiver.com/
User avatar
Romer Treece
Pelagic
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Romer Treece »

Yeah... too bad our dive was the exact opposite. ](*,)
User avatar
Joshua Smith
I've Got Gills
Posts: 10250
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:32 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Joshua Smith »

Grateful Diver wrote:Nice video ... I'd like to dive it again sometime. When we did it last year we had pretty good vis on the barge ... and maybe 2-foot vis on our deco stops ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)

That was a funny day- we had easilly 20-30 feet of vis running down the line, and right about 100', we dropped into pea soup.........
:smt119
Maritime Documentation Society

"To venture into the terrible loneliness, one must have something greater than greed. Love. One needs love for life, for intrigue, for mystery."
User avatar
Maverick
I've Got Gills
Posts: 2517
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:57 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Maverick »

Joshua Smith wrote: and right about 100', we dropped into pea soup.........
:smt119
you mean we dropped into sea poop :evil4:
Maverick

Diving. . . is an active physical form of meditation. It is so silent- You're like a thought.

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR
ANYTHING, BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE
STAIRS.
User avatar
Romer Treece
Pelagic
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Romer Treece »

C'mon!! That's funny :laughing3:
User avatar
CaptnJack
I've Got Gills
Posts: 7776
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:29 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by CaptnJack »

dsteding wrote:Who is putting cave line on these things? Richard, was there line on it when you and Nick videoed it a while back?
I have no idea when the line was laid. It was there last fall for us (you can see it on my left in places). We had crummy 5ft vis at depth after getting teased by 30-50ft shallow. Not much to see except our mugs up in the clear stuff.
http://www.nickambrose.com/diving/movie ... le-MT6.mov

The barge was long since out of railroad service by the time it was in Elliott Bay. I doubt there were railcars aboard since I imagine the tracks were removed when it was converted to general barge service. We certainly didn't recognize anything.

A wreck worth doing tho, with easy currents.
Sounder wrote:Under normal circumstances, I would never tell another man how to shave his balls... but this device should not be kept secret.
User avatar
Romer Treece
Pelagic
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Romer Treece »

The barge was long since out of railroad service by the time it was in Elliott Bay. I doubt there were railcars aboard since I imagine the tracks were removed when it was converted to general barge service. We certainly didn't recognize anything.

Hmmmm/strange... The research I did said it had rail cars aboard when it was hit. Where did you hear it had no cars? Even the pic (which I believe is the salvage) shows it.

"She was rumored to have been carrying 19 sealed railcars, of these six broke loose and floated to shore."
"Later the 6 rail-cars were recovered by another rail-barge, using cranes from the Foss Company who had the salvage contract. "
Cranesalvage.jpg
User avatar
CaptnJack
I've Got Gills
Posts: 7776
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:29 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by CaptnJack »

Ok I think I might have misunderstood "car" (rail vs. a Ford) in the Tacoma Public library database which references Gordon Newell.

http://search.tpl.lib.wa.us/ships/shipfulld.asp?16-7076 (link may not work)
The Tacoma, originally operated across the Columbia River at Kalama, was taken over by the Milwaukee Railroad and placed in service as the car barge Big Six.Gordon Newell, "Maritime Events of 1943-1944," H. W. McCurdy Marine History of the Pacific Northwest.Seattle: Superior Publishing Company, 1966 p. 518.
So where did the other 13 railcars go?? The vis on our dive was so bad they could have hit us in the face and we wouldn't have noticed.
Sounder wrote:Under normal circumstances, I would never tell another man how to shave his balls... but this device should not be kept secret.
User avatar
Pez7378
I've Got Gills
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:09 am

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Pez7378 »

Romer Treece wrote:"She was rumored to have been carrying 19 sealed railcars, of these six broke loose and floated to shore."
"Later the 6 rail-cars were recovered by another rail-barge, using cranes from the Foss Company who had the salvage contract. "
I've been working real hard on my Scuba math, and according to Dans Research, there should be 7 rail cars somewhere near the wreck. But then again, it's only rumor. :smt064
User avatar
Grateful Diver
I've Got Gills
Posts: 5322
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:52 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Grateful Diver »

Pez7378 wrote:
Romer Treece wrote:"She was rumored to have been carrying 19 sealed railcars, of these six broke loose and floated to shore."
"Later the 6 rail-cars were recovered by another rail-barge, using cranes from the Foss Company who had the salvage contract. "
I've been working real hard on my Scuba math, and according to Dans Research, there should be 7 rail cars somewhere near the wreck. But then again, it's only rumor. :smt064
Given the vis ... how do you know they weren't sitting right next to the barge? (Well, OK ... I can tell ya they're not within 20 feet or so, or we'd have seen 'em when I was there) ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Threats and ultimatums are never the best answer. Public humiliation via Photoshop is always better - airsix

Come visit me at http://www.nwgratefuldiver.com/
User avatar
Pez7378
I've Got Gills
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:09 am

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Pez7378 »

The research indicates they were sealed right? Would they have taken longer to sink, and floated a good distance away before they flooded enough to keep em down?
User avatar
Romer Treece
Pelagic
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Romer Treece »

Pez7378 wrote:
Romer Treece wrote:"She was rumored to have been carrying 19 sealed railcars, of these six broke loose and floated to shore."
"Later the 6 rail-cars were recovered by another rail-barge, using cranes from the Foss Company who had the salvage contract. "
I've been working real hard on my Scuba math, and according to Dans Research, there should be 7 rail cars somewhere near the wreck. But then again, it's only rumor. :smt064
Sorry... you might need more schooling (19-6=13) :book: \:D/

It is a mystery where they went-maybe they didn't have 19?? I gots no idea on that one. Unless it flipped over and is on top of them.
User avatar
Romer Treece
Pelagic
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Romer Treece »

Pez7378 wrote:The research indicates they were sealed right? Would they have taken longer to sink, and floated a good distance away before they flooded enough to keep em down?

Possibly.
I have seen bathymetric maps (although edited) of the barge, side scan, and I've never seen the cars. :dontknow: :dontknow:

The newspaper articles only speculated.
Last edited by Romer Treece on Tue Feb 10, 2009 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Pez7378
I've Got Gills
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:09 am

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Pez7378 »

#-o Oh I thought it was six broke loose and floated to shore. And another six were recovered by the rail barge. I guess I've been hanging out with Joe too much. :dontknow: I misread the sentance.
User avatar
Romer Treece
Pelagic
Posts: 964
Joined: Mon Apr 07, 2008 6:09 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Romer Treece »

Joe can do that to ya!! :smt119
User avatar
Joshua Smith
I've Got Gills
Posts: 10250
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:32 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Joshua Smith »

Yeah- first time I dove it was my first class dive for Trimix- we had 30, maybe 40 feet of vis- it was one of those rare days- it felt like you could see forever. There were no rail cars anywhere.....


Grateful Diver wrote:
Pez7378 wrote:
Romer Treece wrote:"She was rumored to have been carrying 19 sealed railcars, of these six broke loose and floated to shore."
"Later the 6 rail-cars were recovered by another rail-barge, using cranes from the Foss Company who had the salvage contract. "
I've been working real hard on my Scuba math, and according to Dans Research, there should be 7 rail cars somewhere near the wreck. But then again, it's only rumor. :smt064
Given the vis ... how do you know they weren't sitting right next to the barge? (Well, OK ... I can tell ya they're not within 20 feet or so, or we'd have seen 'em when I was there) ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Maritime Documentation Society

"To venture into the terrible loneliness, one must have something greater than greed. Love. One needs love for life, for intrigue, for mystery."
User avatar
Maverick
I've Got Gills
Posts: 2517
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:57 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Maverick »

Joshua Smith wrote:Yeah- first time I dove it was my first class dive for Trimix- we had 30, maybe 40 feet of vis- it was one of those rare days- it felt like you could see forever. There were no rail cars anywhere.....


Grateful Diver wrote:
Pez7378 wrote:
Romer Treece wrote:"She was rumored to have been carrying 19 sealed railcars, of these six broke loose and floated to shore."
"Later the 6 rail-cars were recovered by another rail-barge, using cranes from the Foss Company who had the salvage contract. "
I've been working real hard on my Scuba math, and according to Dans Research, there should be 7 rail cars somewhere near the wreck. But then again, it's only rumor. :smt064
Given the vis ... how do you know they weren't sitting right next to the barge? (Well, OK ... I can tell ya they're not within 20 feet or so, or we'd have seen 'em when I was there) ...

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
josh what if it was 45 feet away, would you have seen it? :violent1:
Maverick

Diving. . . is an active physical form of meditation. It is so silent- You're like a thought.

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR
ANYTHING, BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE
STAIRS.
User avatar
Joshua Smith
I've Got Gills
Posts: 10250
Joined: Mon Apr 03, 2006 9:32 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Joshua Smith »

Yes.
Maritime Documentation Society

"To venture into the terrible loneliness, one must have something greater than greed. Love. One needs love for life, for intrigue, for mystery."
User avatar
Maverick
I've Got Gills
Posts: 2517
Joined: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:57 pm

Re: MT No. 6

Post by Maverick »

Maverick on left :violent3: Joshua Smith (Nailer99) on right.
Maverick

Diving. . . is an active physical form of meditation. It is so silent- You're like a thought.

SOME PEOPLE ARE LIKE SLINKIES. NOT REALLY GOOD FOR
ANYTHING, BUT THEY BRING A SMILE TO YOUR FACE WHEN PUSHED DOWN THE
STAIRS.
Post Reply