UTD rock bottom

Discuss Team Diving here.
Post Reply
User avatar
Paulicarp
Aquanaut
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:08 pm

UTD rock bottom

Post by Paulicarp »

How is "Rock Bottom" defined in team diving? With one buddy Rock Bottom is the minimum amount of gas you need to get yourself and your buddy safely to the surface on your own gas. If you've got a team of 3, then is "Rock Bottom" simply the team having a sum total of enough gas to get the whole team to the surface?
User avatar
LCF
I've Got Gills
Posts: 5697
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 5:05 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by LCF »

That's a good question. The answer is that each team member should carry enough gas to get himself and one teammate to the surface, making all appropriate stops. It is preferable not to have to hand off the OOG diver to another teammate on ascent, if it can be avoided. However, with the other teammate ALSO carrying reserves, should there be a delay anywhere in the process of establishing the air-share and beginning the ascent, the other teammate CAN take over responsibility for the OOG diver if it is necessary. (This is more likely to occur in something like a cave, where thirds really isn't conservative at all, if you go through the numbers.)

Some other team resources can be distributed (not everyone may need to carry a spare mask, for example) but gas is carried by everybody.
"Sometimes, when your world is going sideways, the second best thing to everything working out right, is knowing you are loved..." ljjames
User avatar
BDub
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1327
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:39 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by BDub »

Lynne explained it very well Paul.

In short, we don't plan for multiple failures...just the worst case scenario of a single failure
http://www.frogkickdiving.com/

"It's a lot easier when you're not doing it" - CaseyB449

"There needs to be more strawberry condoms. Just not on my regulator" - DSteding
User avatar
Paulicarp
Aquanaut
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:08 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Paulicarp »

who's RMV do you use?
User avatar
Pez7378
I've Got Gills
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:09 am

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Pez7378 »

Paulicarp wrote:who's RMV do you use?
I'd use yours! :smt064
User avatar
BDub
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1327
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:39 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by BDub »

Paulicarp wrote:who's RMV do you use?
Base it on the diver with the highest rmv. If that's not known, its generally based on 1.0 for each diver
http://www.frogkickdiving.com/

"It's a lot easier when you're not doing it" - CaseyB449

"There needs to be more strawberry condoms. Just not on my regulator" - DSteding
User avatar
Pez7378
I've Got Gills
Posts: 3256
Joined: Wed Jun 21, 2006 11:09 am

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Pez7378 »

It's probably safe to assume a maximum working RMV of about 1.0 for anyone on the team.
User avatar
BDub
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1327
Joined: Thu Jun 08, 2006 2:39 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by BDub »

This is as good a place as any...

For anyone interested, I'm planning giving a free gas planning and mangement discussion on Wednesday April 8 at NWSD.

Its been a while since I've done one, and given the recent events I figured the timing was good.

PM me if you're interested.
http://www.frogkickdiving.com/

"It's a lot easier when you're not doing it" - CaseyB449

"There needs to be more strawberry condoms. Just not on my regulator" - DSteding
User avatar
Grateful Diver
I've Got Gills
Posts: 5322
Joined: Mon May 15, 2006 7:52 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Grateful Diver »

BDub wrote:This is as good a place as any...

For anyone interested, I'm planning giving a free gas planning and mangement discussion on Wednesday April 8 at NWSD.

Its been a while since I've done one, and given the recent events I figured the timing was good.

PM me if you're interested.
That's good to know ... in the past few days I've gotten several e-mails and PM's asking when my next one was. Since I've not currently got one in the plans, I now know where to refer them to.

Also nice to see that the way I'm teaching this stuff is consistent with what y'all are doing. I'm currently running a Deep Diver specialty and have been getting the same questions from my students (and providing the same answers).

... Bob (Grateful Diver)
Threats and ultimatums are never the best answer. Public humiliation via Photoshop is always better - airsix

Come visit me at http://www.nwgratefuldiver.com/
User avatar
Paulicarp
Aquanaut
Posts: 646
Joined: Wed Mar 04, 2009 4:08 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Paulicarp »

Pez7378 wrote:
Paulicarp wrote:who's RMV do you use?
I'd use yours! :smt064
The problem is I woke up this morning at the end an intellectual cul-de-sac: I can't trust my life to anyone foolish enough to dive with me!! :shootself:
User avatar
Sockmonkey
I've Got Gills
Posts: 1467
Joined: Sat Mar 15, 2008 9:43 am

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Sockmonkey »

Paulicarp wrote:The problem is I woke up this morning at the end an intellectual cul-de-sac: I can't trust my life to anyone foolish enough to dive with me!! :shootself:
I think you just hit the nail on the team diving head.... two to three dumbasses often make one whole smart diver.

Check out this previous discussion that covers tank factors... rock bottom... basic scuba math... and a couple good links to Spatman and Peter's RB tables.

There's also this somewhat old, confusing, poorly organized, but still highly relevant document from the old UTD: Battlefield Calculations

-Eric
"I used to do this for fun, but now, I do it for nothing" -Not Joshua Smith

:eric: Hawaiian Seamonkey Blog
User avatar
Nwbrewer
I've Got Gills
Posts: 4623
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:59 am

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Nwbrewer »

Pez7378 wrote:It's probably safe to assume a maximum working RMV of about 1.0 for anyone on the team.
I used to use 1.0 for anyone. Certain recent dives have led me to use 2.9 unless I know the diver. :violent1:
Fishstiq
Amphibian
Posts: 827
Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2007 7:58 am

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Fishstiq »

Nwbrewer wrote:
Pez7378 wrote:It's probably safe to assume a maximum working RMV of about 1.0 for anyone on the team.
I used to use 1.0 for anyone. Certain recent dives have led me to use 2.9 unless I know the diver. :violent1:
Whoever could you be referring to Jake?




:huge: :smt064
Not just front page famous, but above the fold famous...

Waiting for your AIDS test results is no time to be thinking positive.
User avatar
LCF
I've Got Gills
Posts: 5697
Joined: Tue May 30, 2006 5:05 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by LCF »

I hope you weren't planning 2.9 tonight . . . :)
"Sometimes, when your world is going sideways, the second best thing to everything working out right, is knowing you are loved..." ljjames
User avatar
Nwbrewer
I've Got Gills
Posts: 4623
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 10:59 am

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by Nwbrewer »

Nope, not tonight, but Chris and Joe know who...
User avatar
CaptnJack
I've Got Gills
Posts: 7776
Joined: Fri Jul 07, 2006 2:29 pm

Re: UTD rock bottom

Post by CaptnJack »

BTW in case there's some ambiguity, there really isn't a "rock bottom" in a horizontal overhead environment like a cave. There are different guesses used to decide how much gas to reserve.
Sounder wrote:Under normal circumstances, I would never tell another man how to shave his balls... but this device should not be kept secret.
Post Reply